[AVSB-106] LetterSalutation (IDMS_SALUTATION), ContactSalutation (IDMS_CPSalutation) Created: 07/Feb/22 Updated: 15/Feb/22 Resolved: 15/Feb/22 |
|
Status: | Done |
Project: | AVAG Pilot Sieber |
Component/s: | None |
Affects Version/s: | None |
Fix Version/s: | 2.58, 2.57.3, Neuro.1.3.0 |
Type: | Task | Priority: | Critical |
Reporter: | Vana Dimitrakopoulou | Assignee: | Stefan Podboj |
Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
Labels: | Thinkrit | ||
Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
Time Spent: | 1 hour | ||
Original Estimate: | Not Specified |
Attachments: | AVSB-106 - SalutationMappings.sql cp_json.txt image-2022-02-11-08-54-03-391.png image-2022-02-15-14-01-53-429.png | ||||||||
Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
Tenant: |
Product
|
||||||||
Escalate: | No | ||||||||
Unplanned Remaining Estimate: | 0 | ||||||||
For Team Discussion: | No | ||||||||
Resolution Details: | Done (Wiki/OneSyncway Updated) | ||||||||
Attachment_Name: | AVSB-106 - SalutationMappings.sql, cp_json.txt, image-2022-02-11-08-54-03-391.png, image-2022-02-15-14-01-53-429.png | ||||||||
Specification Status: | 1. Not Planned |
Description |
Hallo, 1) IDSM_Salutation must be added as object type 2) IDMS_CPSalutation: values to be exposed in the object type for mapping
Tech. Spec. Change 1 LetterSalutation (DMS Identifier) (Which will replace in the future Salutation property)
The previous req. below is de-scoped as AVAG is not even using it.
|
Comments |
Comment by Vana Dimitrakopoulou [ 07/Feb/22 ] |
Hi, Please check those two Thanks FYI:Stefan Podboj |
Comment by Stefan Podboj [ 10/Feb/22 ] |
Hi, any news on that? Br, Toni Feldinger, Panagiotis Konidis, Baris Oezhan, Vana Dimitrakopoulou, FYI |
Comment by Stefan Podboj [ 11/Feb/22 ] |
now i see values in the mapping:
But if i want to map something Carlo doesn't receive a mapping-Request for this (and as a result i don't see DMS-Values to map in DSW). Please check. Thank you! Br, |
Comment by Panagiotis Konidis [ 11/Feb/22 ] |
CP salutation is not relevant to DMS but only the Letter salutation field which are based on IDMS_SALUTATION table instead of IDMS_CPSALUTATION. The CPSALUTATION Table configuration is used internally only.
Due the latter, Carlo does not receive a mapping request because there is no such endpoint exposed to provide the values from Carlo
|
Comment by Stefan Podboj [ 11/Feb/22 ] |
Hi Panagiotis Konidis, Vana Dimitrakopoulou, ok. So how can this be solved? Only if we create the IDMS_Salutations with exact the same code(s) as they are existing in Carlo? Br, |
Comment by Vana Dimitrakopoulou [ 15/Feb/22 ] |
Stefan Podboj: Hello Stefan, for every CP we are going to use the following salutations: 1) Title: Mapped as Academic title 2) Letter salutation: IDMS_Salutation without Mapping, I have added the value Frau which obviously you have in your salutations and we received 200. Please check the Helena Mirren CP. attached the json. cp_json.txt
we will delete the code-numbers in the prod and we will create records with your values, so no mapping will be needed. see screenshot attached
|
Comment by Stefan Podboj [ 15/Feb/22 ] |
Hi Vana Dimitrakopoulou, Panagiotis Konidis, tested - ok. Baris Oezhan, Toni Feldinger, that means we only have a mapping for Titles but not for Salutations in the future. Br, |
Sales Offer Validity Date by Division Code
(ODP-2721)
[ODP-3113] ODIL - "ValidTo" Date for DocumentDto Created: 11/Feb/22 Updated: 22/Feb/22 Due: 18/Feb/22 Resolved: 21/Feb/22 |
|
Status: | Done |
Project: | OD Product |
Component/s: | None |
Affects Version/s: | None |
Fix Version/s: | 2.58, Neuro.1.3.0, 2.57.13 |
Type: | Sub-task | Priority: | Medium |
Reporter: | Panagiotis Konidis | Assignee: | odil (thinkrit) |
Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
Labels: | Thinkrit | ||
Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
Original Estimate: | Not Specified |
Business Unit: |
Interfaces
|
Escalate: | No |
Target Date: | |
Unplanned Remaining Estimate: | 0 |
For Team Discussion: | No |
Target Version: | |
Scope: |
Wholesales Product Phase 2
|
Specification Status: | 1. Not Planned |
Description |
We need to expose a new DateTime Property in order to communicate the expiration date of an Offer Document. 0
SalesDocumentDto (Document header)
property name: ValidTo property type: DateTime property description: "Offer validity expiration"
Nullable = true
|
Comments |
Comment by odil (thinkrit) [ 14/Feb/22 ] |
Changes are implemented |